November 4, 2007
Is Hans down?
There was an interesting post on Firedoglake (one of my favorite sites) this week about the pending nomination of Hans von Spakovsky to the Federal Elections Commission (FEC). Christy Hardin Smith is speculating that this nomination may be in more trouble than has been publicly known.
For those who haven’t been following the career of Hans, here is the eloquent condemnation by the marvelous Christy at http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/28/hans-down/#more-12542
Try von Spakovsky sockpuppeting an article about voter suppression in violation of DOJ rules while he was still an employee there ostensibly working on civil rights issues. Or how about participating in an effort to disenfranchise elderly Native American voters in Arizona on a technicality rather than working to find a way to support their right to vote. Or the entire gaming the system for The Math scheme at the DOJ. Or that a number of his subordinates at the DOJ wrote in to the Senate to say that von Spakovsky has neither the ethical underpinnings nor the commitment to voting integrity that should not be gamed for political purposes to be anywhere near the FEC. And there is so much more: see Digby and Adam at ePluribusMedia, for starters.
Christy was responding to ominous Washington Post musings suggesting that the end of the sky was falling (or something equally dire) if the four nominees for the FEC (including the infamous voter suppression specialist von Spakovsky) were not immediately confirmed. Why, the FEC would be unable to function with only the two current members … it would be short-staffed (gasp of shock). So the Senate should rush right out and confirm the whole bunch — whadya waiting for, folks — hurry, scurry — get it done.
This ignores what Christy rightly calls
the odor of political gaming of voter’s rights that eminates from von Spakovsky’s long record of partisan action
Hans von Spakovsky should not be given a six year appointment to any agency having anything to do with elections, including the FEC.
“This is the first nomination that the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights has ever opposed,” said Wade Henderson, the group’s president. He said he thinks that von Spakovsky would “use his role at the FEC to make it more difficult for voters to exercise their franchise.”…
Because of concerns about von Spakovsky’s track record on voter suppression, Senators Feingold and Obama have both placed holds on the nominations of the block of four current nominees. Because of a “deal” the four nominations (2 Democrats and 2 Republicans) are set to be voted on as a block rather than individually. This “all or nothing” approach would prevent von Spakovsky from getting an up-or-down vote on his own (de)merits.
The block should be busted and each nominee should get a vote on their own record. Then there would be accountability. Then the U.S. Senate would be exercising their true “advise and consent” function under the Constitution. Hans von Spakovsky should be denied a free pass and be voted down based on his record.